That Philadelphia Inquirer columnist Will Bunch is seriously infected with #TrumpDerangementSyndrome is of no surprise to anyone who reads his columns, at least anyone who isn’t already infected with #TDS himself. We have previously noted how the credentialed media were complicit in the coverup of outgoing President Biden’s significantly declining mental status, something about which Mr Bunch has not complained, yet the columnist on Sunday afternoon complained that former and future President Donald Trump and Twitter owner Elon Musk are waging “an all out war on the truth.”
Forget Greenland. Trump and Musk’s real WWIII is an all-out war on the truth.
Amid a fog of MAGA lies, the Trump-Musk tag team escalates its war on facts, from Wikipedia to the State Department.
by Will Bunch | Sunday, December 29, 2024 | 2:10 PM EST
In a world where the news doesn’t stop getting more bat-guano crazy just because it’s Christmas, where a phony war between the United States and Denmark consumes more electrons than the heartbreakingly real ones in Gaza and Ukraine, you might have missed a major escalation in the world conflict that matters most.
The unrelenting and wildly successful war on facts, also known as truth.
A man with 11 kids who spends Christmas Eve tweeting, Elon Musk — the ketamine-fueled Bond villain and richest human in world history who emerged from the Trojan horse of America’s 2024 presidential election hell-bent on world domination — showed yet again that it’s never enough for him.
Sure, his $44 billion dagger into the heart of the U.S. political conversation by buying flawed-but-freewheeling Twitter and turning it into a right-wing cesspool called X helped drag Donald Trump over the Nov. 5 finish line, but what about those pesky pockets of fact-diggers and truth-tellers he hasn’t bought or destroyed yet?
Really? We have previously noted that pre-Musk Twitter, and the left in general, do not like Freedom of Speech. When it comes to the subject of transgenderism, Twitter has already banned ‘deadnaming’ and ‘misgendering.’[1]‘Deadnaming’ means referring to a ‘transgender’ person by his given name at birth, rather than the name he has taken to match the sex he claims to be; … Continue reading The New York Times, which so strongly defended its right to Freedom of Speech and of the Press in New York Times Co v United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971), gave space in the OpEd section to Andrew Marantz to write “Free Speech is killing us. Noxious language online is causing real-world violence.” Mr Marantz, while exercising his First Amendment rights, clearly does not like the unregulated speech of others. The Times had earlier given OpEd page space to ‘transgender’ activist Chad Malloy to claim that Twitter’s ban on ‘deadnamimg’ and ‘misgendering’ actually promotes the Freedom of Speech.[2]Chad Malloy is a male who claims to be female, using the name Parker Marie Malloy. The First Street Journal’s Stylebook notes that we always refer to the ‘transgendered’ by their … Continue reading
We reported that pre-Musk Twitter had suspended William Teach for a tweet which told the truth, and that a Catholic publication had been suspended there for referring to Dr Richard Levine — whom the publication referred to as Rachel, Dr Levine’s preferred name — as a “biological man identifying as a transgender woman,” a statement which is objectively true. We reported how Mr Bunch’s own newspaper censored comments on a sports article about Will Thomas, the University of Pennsylvania’s male swimmer masquerading as a female and calling himself “Lia,” while Mr Bunch himself wants the supposedly professional media to attack Donald Trump’s campaign mercilessly, rather than stick to an unbiased news format. Mr Bunch wants us all to believe that he is for freedom of speech, but he was appalled when billionaire Elon Musk was — at the time — trying to buy Twitter and end its censorship of conservatives:
The Philadelphia-educated Musk’s scheme to buy Twitter with a combination of his obscene wealth and other people’s money, take the social media site that’s most beloved by the world’s intelligentsia private, and declare himself a hero of the brand of “free speech” that tends to be freest for privileged white men, hasn’t turned out like he’d planned. It’s not just that the love Musk has taken from conservatives for his plans to remake Twitter (and, among other things, bring back the banned Donald Trump) has not been equal to the enmity from so many others who don’t want their social media Musk-ed up.
He certainly didn’t believe that former President Trump had freedom of speech, or that Twitter users should be allowed to read what Mr Trump wrote.
Mr Bunch’s latest subject of outrage? Elon Musk’s comments about Wikipedia:
No wonder the $436 billion man wants to crush Wikipedia (yearly budget, $177 million), the nonprofit internet encyclopedia that uses a messy but open and democratic editing process to grind toward truth. Musk, whose feuds with a website where he can’t buy and bury details from his antisemitic tweets to allegedly asking a SpaceX employee to “have his babies” are not new, fired off a series of new salvos.
Note what he wrote, that Wikipedia “uses a messy but open and democratic editing process to grind toward truth.” Translation: anyone can edit articles on Wikipedia if he creates an account. Well, guess what? I have a Wikipedia account, and could edit articles there, if I so chose. I have used it exactly once, months ago, to add the last paragraph concerning delivery of the Lexington Herald-Leader, to note the change in the print edition delivery, from six to three days a week. The edit was strictly factual, and not politically slanted at all, but I could have added an untruthful or politically slanted bit to any Wikipedia article I chose. Mr Bunch is wildly indignant that Twitter is now open to conservatives tweeting what they wish, and not censored by leftist restrictions.
The illustration at the top of this article? That’s a screen capture of Mr Bunch’s skeet on Bluesky, pushing his column to his followers on that Twitter copycat site. He previously referred to Twitter as the “Bad Place,” but tweeted a plug for his column there as well. For all of his complaints about Twitter being “a right-wing cesspool” — and I see tweets from both right and left on Twitter — he is migrating to a site which has some of the pre-Musk Twitter protocols, protocols which can be used to censor people. That’s his free choice. But don’t tell me you support Freedom of Speech when you support censorship of speech!
References
↑1 | ‘Deadnaming’ means referring to a ‘transgender’ person by his given name at birth, rather than the name he has taken to match the sex he claims to be; ‘misgendering’ means referring to a ‘transgender’ person by sex-specific terms referring to his biological sex rather than the sex he claims to be. |
---|---|
↑2 | Chad Malloy is a male who claims to be female, using the name Parker Marie Malloy. The First Street Journal’s Stylebook notes that we always refer to the ‘transgendered’ by their birth names and biological sex. The linked Wikipedia biographical article on Mr Malloy was deleted at 7:09 PM EST on December 14, 2024 by Wikipedia User OwenX. I have retained the link in this footnote so that you can see from where I got my original source. A screen capture of the notice can be seen here. |