Judge Emmet G Sullivan needs to recuse himself from all cases involving the Capitol kerfuffle He has just, in open court, shown himself to be thoroughly biased against the defendants

As we noted Monday, Dawn Bancroft, 59, of Doylestown, Pennsylvania, was going to plead guilty to a single misdemeanor charge of Parading, Demonstrating, or Picketing in a Capitol Building, the penalty for which is a maximum of six months in jail and a fine of $5,000.[1]40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(G).

    A Doylestown woman who said she wanted to shoot Pelosi ‘in the friggin’ brain’ pleaded guilty to Capitol riot charges

    Dawn Bancroft said she didn’t mean to threaten the House Speaker and called her remark a “stupid comment.” A federal judge questioned whether she was getting off too lightly with a misdemeanor plea.

    by Jeremy Roebuck | Tuesday, September 28, 2021

    A Bucks County gym owner who recorded herself during the storming of the Capitol saying she was looking for Nancy Pelosi “to shoot her in the friggin’ brain” pleaded guilty to a federal misdemeanor Tuesday, making her the latest Pennsylvanian to admit her role in the Jan. 6 riot.

    Dawn Bancroft, 59, of Doylestown, told a federal judge she didn’t mean to threaten the House speaker and described her remark in hindsight as a “stupid, juvenile comment” made in the heat of the moment.

    Yet, U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan expressed concern about Bancroft’s statements and questioned why prosecutors had agreed to let her plead to a misdemeanor count of illegally demonstrating, picketing, or parading inside the Capitol — which carries a maximum sentence of six months in prison — instead of pursuing more serious charges of threatening a member of Congress.

    “It’s very troubling to hear that the reason [she] was at the Capitol on Jan. 6 was essentially to murder the speaker of the House,” the judge said.

How can that be considered the statement of an unbiased judge? Would any of the Capitol kerfufflers who appeared in his court for an actual trial get a fair shake?

    His remarks came on a day that saw two other Pennsylvania residents admit that they took part in the Jan. 6 insurrection. Also pleading guilty Tuesday was Diana Santo-Smith, 32, of Bucks County, who traveled by train with Bancroft to Washington and who appeared in the background of her incriminating selfie video.

    Sullivan ultimately accepted the misdemeanor pleas from both women despite his reservations. But he warned them he would have much more to say about their conduct when it came time for sentencing in January.

    He marveled at just how many otherwise law-abiding citizens had “morphed into terrorists” that day and said he agreed with recent comments from former President George W. Bush alluding to the Capitol riot as an act of domestic terrorism on par with the Sept. 11 attacks.

Former President Bush, for whom I twice voted, was being stupid when he said that. Comparing what was, in effect, an out of control college keg party in which the only people who died were the partiers, one of whom was shot in the head by a Capitol policeman, with four hijacked airliners, used as weapons, to kill thousands of people. The Inquirer reported that:

    (Mrs Bancroft and Mrs Santos-Smith) broke into the building through an already shattered window and spent less than a minute inside, prosecutors said, before making their way back out again.

    It was while they were trying to push their way back out through the crowd that Bancroft filmed herself and Santos-Smith.

    “We broke into the Capitol. We got inside. We did our part,” she said. “We were looking for Nancy to shoot her in the friggin’ brain. We didn’t find her, but all is good.”

They spent less than a minute, according to prosecutors, but Judge Sullivan wanted Mrs Bancroft charged much more harshly. The prosecution noted that Mrs Bancroft’s remark was made as they were leaving the building, and there is no evidence that either of them was armed.

Every defense attorney for any of the kerfufflers assigned to Judge Sullivan’s court should be ready with a demand that Judge Sullivan recuse himself in the event of anything more than a guilty plea under 40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(G), because His Honor has proven himself not to be honorable, proven himself to be thoroughly biased against the defendants.

References

Spread the love