Social media has been full of information about the anti-government demonstrations in Iran, and one of the biggest complaints is that the credentialed media are not seriously covering it, something I have pointed out as well.

And on Thursday, January 8, 2026, at 12:30 PM EST, our nation’s greatest and most respected newspaper, The New York Times, had exactly zero stories on the subject visible on their website main page. Fortunately, I had looked earlier this morning, and there was one, and only one article:

Protests Spread in Iran, and Crackdowns Escalate

Bazaars were shuttered and demonstrators met with violence from security forces amid rising anger about the country’s dire economic situation.

By Farnaz Fassihi | Wednesday, January 7, 2026

As strikes and protests spread to several major cities across Iran on Wednesday, the head of the judiciary threatened to intensify crackdowns and prosecute protesters.

Merchants and business owners in the traditional bazaars in the cities of Tabriz, Isfahan, Mashhad and Kerman closed to protest the dire state of the economy and the plunging currency, according to videos on social media, interviews with witnesses and Iranian media reports. The bazaars of Iran have both practical and symbolic significance — not just where people buy things, but also an emblem of the economy, like stock markets in the West.

In Tehran, shops in the traditional bazaar, where the recent wave of protests began, remained shuttered for an 11th day. Inside its labyrinth of passages, security forces deployed tear gas and beat some in the crowd of shopkeepers and workers gathered there, according to interviews with two shop owners who asked that their names not be published because they feared retribution.

The two shopkeepers, who are members of trade unions, said in telephone interviews that the government’s efforts to mediate with trade representatives so far had failed. One of the shopkeepers said that despite fears of financial losses, solidarity had prevailed to keep shops closed and pressure on. It was unclear how long this could last.

There’s more at the original.

Reporter Farnaz Fassihi, about whom the Times> told us, “has covered Iran for three decades and has lived and traveled extensively in the country,” was pretty circumspect in her journalism. From what she wrote, a reasonable reader could not conclude which ‘side’ was winning, and perhaps that was exactly the message she was attempting to convey. We are not told whether Miss Fassihi was reporting from inside Iran, so we do not know if her safety is compromised.

The impression one gets from seeing the social media reports is that the government of the mad mullahs is about to fall, and maybe it is, but it is at least as likely that the government, engaged in serious measures to stifle dissent, will survive.

Anti-riot police officers have taken to the streets of Tehran and other cities on motorcycles, chasing crowds and beating demonstrators, according to videos on BBC Persian and social media. Some videos show security forces firing shots at the crowd; in other videos, gunshots can be heard. In Shiraz, military roadblocks were set up on a tree-lined boulevard with military vehicles patrolling.

Yet the government of President Masoud Pezeshkian struck a conciliatory tone, with Fatemeh Mohajeran, a spokeswoman, saying on social media on Wednesday that “all protesters are our children and every blood spilled pains us.”

By contrast, the head of the judiciary, Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Eje’i, and the country’s chief of security forces, Gen. Ahmad Reza Radan, told Iranian media that stern measures would be taken against protesters.

“We promise the Iranian nation that these people will be identified at any time and in any place, and will be prosecuted and punished until the last person is arrested,” said General Radan, according to Iranian state media.

There have been uprisings against the theocratic government before, uprisings which faltered and failed, and as much as I would like to be optimistic that the Iranian government will fall, the realist in me says to hold back, to wait, to see what actually happens.

But part of waiting to see what actually happens is restricted by the serious lack of journalistic coverage on the uprising. In 1979, as the Iranian Revolution which deposed Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi was unfolding, it seemed though we got far more news about it the in the United States, with just three television networks playing 30-minute-long evening news shows — even CNN was not formed until a year later — and newspapers to cover the story, newspapers which did not have instant, 24-hour availability over that internet thingy Al Gore invented. In 1979, I could read about the Iranian Revolution in the Lexington Herald-Leader, a decent-sized newspaper for a city of 220,000 people^[1]That was then. In 2026, it’s just junk, a failing McClatchy newspaper that only publishes thrice a week, and delivered by mail now, is always a day late., but The New York Times? That was something that people could get at the Joseph A Best Bookstore across Reynolds Road from Fayette Mall . . . a day later. Students could go to the Margaret King Library on the University of Kentucky campus, and read the Times, or The Washington Post, again a day late.

Yet we still seemed to get more news about the Iranian Revolution from those limited and delayed sources than we are now seeing in a world with near instantaneous internet connections, the major television networks, CNN, Fox, MS Now, News Nation, and the websites of multiple television stations as well as newspapers.

Why is that?

Chris Freiman tweeted:

An uncharitable view that I can’t shake: the left is silent on Iran simply because it can’t bring itself to criticize any regime that’s opposed to the US

A lot of our friends across the pond have been extremely critical of the BBC’s lack of reporting. Saul Sadka wrote:

NEW LOW FOR THE BBC: This is the current state of its homepage. There is happy news about the birth of twin mountain gorillas, and about Prince Harry meeting his father, the King, but nothing—not a single word—about the protests in Iran that threaten to bring down the IRGC.

Me? I have snarked that the credentialed media are worried that if the uprising does oust the Islamist government, President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu might get some of the credit, and they can’t have that! on the other hand, if the uprising fails, and the government kills a bunch of the protesters, the media will give Messrs Trump and Netanyahu the blame!