Since the Pennsylvania state Supreme Court invalidated Governor Tom Wolf’s in-school mask mandate, local school boards have been — albeit slowly — relaxing their COVID-19 restrictions, not because the local school boards really want to do so, but because much of the public demand it.

More Philly-area schools are ending mask mandates, but the question of how and when is dividing communities

The shifting landscape — in absence of any unified standard — has brought new tension over how to move beyond pandemic restrictions that have shaped the last two years.

by Maddie Hanna | Sunday, February 20, 2022

As a group of students walked out of Conestoga High School a little more than a week ago in defiance of mask requirements — banging lockers and shouting “Freedom!” along the way — they set off a social media feud that reflected a broader debate.

With omicron retreating, and mandates at the state and city level being rolled back, suburban schools that have maintained universal masking in line with public health recommendations now find themselves asking: When, and how, can they move beyond the restrictions that have shaped the last two years?

No, they “maintained universal masking” in line with state government orders; many districts were ending or at least reducing the restrictions last fall, before Governor Wolf stepped in. He had previously said that he would not impose such a mandate, leaving it up to local authorities, but when they didn’t do what he wanted voluntarily, he used a trick to get around the voter-passed constitutional amendments limiting his power. The reporter, Maddie Hanna, knew this; she was one of the three reporters credited with the story noting the Governor’s mask mandate!

But not everyone agrees on the right approach.

While a growing number of health-care professionals have called for school mandates to end, the CDC and American Academy of Pediatrics have continued to endorse universal masking in schools given still-high transmission levels. (The CDC said last week it’s considering a change to its mask guidance, though it was unclear how that might apply to schools.)

The Inquirer, which editorially favors all of the restrictions, and even more, that have been imposed on the public, illustrated the article with a photo of people holding up signs in favor of universal masking in a Havorford Township school board meeting.

But the most important passage of the story might not have been one Miss Hanna intended, but I spotted:

In Wallingford-Swarthmore, one mother, believing the district has moved to optional masking too quickly, started crying while describing her fear that parental discord would now be reflected by children; others worried about risks to immunocompromised or disabled students, concerns that have spurred lawsuits.

In West Chester and Downingtown, residents are petitioning to remove school board directors for ordering masking, while in Tredyffrin/Easttown — where threats following the Conestoga walkout prompted the high school to close for a day — a father was banned from district property after giving a fiery speech in the boys’ wrestling locker room encouraging defiance of the mask mandate: “They cannot defeat you if you stick together. Do not let them f— with your minds.”

Nothing in the current referenced story, or the ones internally linked, stated that this unnamed father advocated violence, or issued or was connected with any threat, but Conestoga High School banned him from school property for a “fiery speech”. But the father was right: if the students stick together, and ditch their masks en masse, they will win . . . and the school board cannot tolerate that.