The First Street Journal has twice previously written about the murders of black transgender ‘women,’ pointing out that most politically incorrect of facts, that the majority of such victims were working as prostitutes, and that meant many of the victims were killed by ‘johns’ they tricked — pun most definitely intended — into thinking they were real women, and the ‘johns’ reacted violently when the found out that they had been sexually assaulted by another male.

Let me be plain here: if a male disguises himself as a woman in order to have some form of sex with another male, and the other male does not realize that the disguised male is not really a woman, he has been raped!

Now we come to the other side of this situation:

Texas murder suspect runs victim over twice before kissing, stabbing his limp body: VIDEO

By Brooke Taylor, KTRK | Saturday, May 11, 2024 | 11:38 AM CDT

HOUSTON — Our Houston sister station, ABC13 Eyewitness News, obtained a deeply disturbing video of a murder in broad daylight.

On May 3, the victim, Steven Anderson, was walking on a Texas street to pick up mail when a car ran him over.

The suspect is 20-year-old Karon Fisher, identified in court records as a man but also described as a woman by police.

Video below the fold. Continue reading →

My very good friends on the left used to love, when presented with a fact which challenged their assertions, to use the expression, “The plural of anecdote is not data.” I, of course, pointed out that an ‘anecdote,’ if confirmed, actually is a datum. A few years ago, Barry Ritholtz writing in The Big Picture, reported:

Which brings us back to anecdotes: As it turns out, the original quote about anecdotes had a very different context, and a much more nuanced meaning. It is attributed to Ray Wolfinger, who was a political scientist at the University of California-Berkeley.

Wolfinger’s original statement was quite literally the very opposite of what we all have been using. He had actually said “the plural of anecdote is data.” This should affect the way we think about and use data.

Mr Ritholtz noted the problem of selection bias. Yes, he used as an example, shark attacks are dangerous, and frequently lethal, but the vast majority of interactions between humans and sharks do not result in sharks attacking humans. I am reminded of General ‘Buck’ Turgidson’s statement in Dr Strangelove, “I don’t think it’s fair to condemn the whole program due to a single slip-up.” And that leads me to the obvious question: just how many of these data points does it take to destroy the narrative? Continue reading →