“It’s a shame that another Black male, young male, is losing his life to the system,” Josephus Davis said. “It’s another white judge, white family, white DA, and another Black male.”

‘You will die in prison’: Philadelphia man is sentenced to life in prison for murder of Brewerytown man walking his dog

Josephus Davis, 21, was convicted in the murder of Milan Loncar, who was fatally shot while walking his dog in Brewerytown last year.

by Ellie Rushing | Friday, August 26, 2022

After an emotional two-hour hearing that brought even a seasoned homicide prosecutor to tears, a Philadelphia man on Friday was ordered to spend the rest of his life in prison for fatally shooting a man as he walked his dog in Brewerytown last year.

Josephus Davis, 21, was convicted of second-degree murder, robbery, and related offenses in June for the killing of Milan Loncar, 25, a Wayne native and Temple University graduate. Loncar was walking his dog after work in January 2021 when Davis and another man held him at gunpoint in an attempted robbery. After rifling through his pockets, Davis shot Loncar in the chest, then ran away as Loncar lay bleeding on the street.

Think about that: after robbing Mr Loncar, when there was absolutely no need to do so, Mr Davis shot and killed his victim anyway, but, “It’s a shame that another black male, young male, is losing his life to the system.” Perhaps, just perhaps, it was Mr Davis who took the decision to spend the rest of his miserable life in jail, not that “white judge, white family, (and) white DA.”

During Friday’s sentencing hearing, Common Pleas Court Judge Barbara A. McDermott read segments of the approximately 25 letters submitted by family and friends detailing how Loncar’s death has affected their lives. All described him as caring and loving, “the best person [they’d] ever met.”

Jelena Loncar, 28, said she has not been able to work more than 20 hours per week since her brother’s death. She sold her house in Brewerytown after the shooting and, along with other family and friends, moved out of Philadelphia, the pain and fear of the ongoing violence crisis too much to bear.

Ellie Rushing, The Philadelphia Inquirer reporter, went through some time and effort to tell us how loved Mr Loncar was by his family and friends, but there’s a certain point which arose in my mind: yes, Mr Loncar may have been a wonderful guy, but does that mean his life was somehow worth more than the lives of many of the thugs who’ve also been killed in the City of Brotherly Love? We have previously noted how Fayette County Commonwealth’s Attorney Lou Anna Red Corn “mediated” crimes and allowed lenient plea deals and sentences for murderers — I suppose “manslaughterers” would be a more mocking term for their crimes now — and if that happened in the Bluegrass State rather than Philadelphia, the same things are happening all around the country in our cities. Of course, in those Lexington cases, the murdered manslaughtered men were black gang members as well, while Mr Loncar was white.

And even as Davis maintained his innocence, and his mother testified of his traumatic childhood filled with abuse and instability, Judge McDermott was firm in meting out his punishment.

“You will die in prison,” she said.

McDermott sentenced Davis to life in prison without the possibility of parole, the mandatory sentence in Pennsylvania for second-degree murder.

Of course, Mr Davis chose to fight the charges in a jury trial, and was convicted. Had that not happened, District Attorney Larry Krasner would probably given him a nice, soft plea bargain. Ahhh, but then again, the very black Mr Davis killed a white victim, generating the kind of sympathy that the murder of Samuel Collington,  a Temple University student approaching graduation. Mr Collington was a white victim, allegedly murdered by a black juvenile in a botched robbery. Then the Inquirer published 14 photographs from a vigil for Mr Collington, along with another story about him. Five separate stories about the case of a murdered white guy.

The Inquirer even broke precedent when it came to Mr Collington’s murder by including the name of the juvenile suspect in the case, and delving into his previous record.

The Inquirer, a newspaper which publisher Elizabeth Hughes vowed to make “an antiracist news organization”? I see that the paper paid more attention to the accidental killing of Jason Kutt, a white teenager shot at Nockamixon State Park, an hour outside of the city. That’s five separate stories, a whole lot more than the two or three paragraphs most victims get.

Let me be clear here: I absolutely support the sentence Mr Davis received, and it’s a good thing that state law sets life in prison without the possibility of parole as being mandatory for second-degree murder; no judge should have any leeway in that. What I oppose is the lenient plea bargain deals which let murders off with manslaughter convictions, meaning that they can see a time at which they will be released, and, all too frequently, are eligible for early parole. Murders should not get out of prison until the day that their victims come back to life!

It seems that this was not Mr Davis first brush with the law:

Prosecutors, though, said the evidence was clear: As Loncar walked his dog, Roo, near 31st and Jefferson Street that January evening — two blocks from his residence, and a half-block from Davis’ — Davis and an accomplice attacked him.

So, both murderer and his victim were neighbors, living in an integrated area. Zillow shows me an area of mixed housing, some older and in not the greatest repair, while other residences have been fixed up and selling well into the $300,000 range.

Later that night, Davis was stopped by police in Kensington after officers recognized the car he was in as having been reported stolen in a carjacking the day before. Davis and a few other men hopped out and ran, Assistant District Attorney Joanne Pescatore said.

When police caught and questioned Davis, he wore a distinctive belt and shoes — evidence prosecutors used to match him to surveillance video of Loncar’s murder. Police later tested Davis’ clothes for ballistics evidence and found a small amount of gunshot residue on one of his jackets. The accomplice has not been identified.

Davis, one of 14 children, spent most of his life in the system, family testified. His mother said he was taken from her, along with his siblings, when he was 8, and forced to live with his father, who struggled with addiction and homelessness. Davis was arrested for the first time at 14 for assault, and bounced between numerous behavioral health facilities through his childhood. When he was 12 years old, his mother said, Davis witnessed a facility staffer fatally beat another child.

“You all think he is a monster,” she said. “But the streets turned him that way.”

Well, perhaps his mother being such a rotten parent that the Commonwealth took her children away from her might have had something to do with it, and not just “the streets.”

Davis’ crimes continued into adulthood. He was arrested four times for robbery and aggravated assault, the judge said. He was on probation for robbery at the time of the murder, and was awaiting trial on charges of carjacking and assaulting a jail guard. He had been released from jail two weeks before killing Loncar.

Mr Davis has two brothers also locked up, so it’s a criminal family, which makes me wonder: was he treated leniently by the District Attorney in a manner which allowed him out of jail two weeks before he killed Mr Loncar? Could Mr Davis have been behind bars on January 13, 2021, the day he robbed and killed Mr Loncar? If he could have been behind bars on that date, did the legal system, did the District Attorney, do him any favors by letting him out early? The 21-year-old Mr Davis might have been looking at several more years behind bars, but at least be able to see, into the future, when he would get out. But because he was out, and able to kill someone, he will only be freed when he has been freed from this mortal life.

I can have some sympathy for Mr Davis, in that he grew up without much of a chance. Saying that he was “forced to live with his father” is the same thing as saying that his father did not live with his mother. Somehow, some way, Western culture has decided that the primary organizational structure of every human society of which we have any knowledge, for as far back into history as we can determine social structure, normal, heterosexual marriage, with both fathers and mothers living together and rearing their children together, is just so much junk, and can be blithely discarded, leaving people like Mr Davis’ mother alone to bring up 14 kids. We have allowed our own selfishness to ruin things for everyone.

But having some sympathy for Mr Davis does not mean that I think his crimes should be excused or minimized: he killed another man, and were he somehow freed, he’d wind up killing someone else. I can hope that he finds God in prison, and that his life after this one will be better.