A black woman was shot in the head at 4:11 AM on Saturday, September 3th in the Tacony section of the city, and all the Inquirer had was:
At 4:11 a.m., a 29-year-old woman was shot once in the face by someone she knew. No additional information was immediately available.
Police said the woman was in stable but critical condition at Jefferson Torresdale Hospital.
But, to be fair, the abduction of Mrs Fletcher was a national story; much of the credentialed media covered the story of the abduction of the pretty white woman.
Man charged in jogger abduction kidnapped attorney in 2000
The man charged with kidnapping a Tennessee woman jogging near the University of Memphis last week spent 20 years behind bars for a previous kidnapping
by Associated Press | Updated: Tuesday, September 6, 2022
MEMPHIS, Tenn. (AP) — The man charged with kidnapping a Tennessee woman jogging near the University of Memphis last week spent 20 years behind bars for a previous kidnapping.
U.S. Marshals arrested 38-year-old Cleotha Abston on Saturday after police detected his DNA on a pair of sandals found near to where Eliza Fletcher was last seen, according to an arrest affidavit. Police also linked the vehicle they believe was used in the kidnapping to a person at a residence where Abston was staying.
While Fletcher has not been found, Memphis police said in the affidavit they believe she was seriously injured in the abduction, which was caught on surveillance video. Authorities have said Fletcher, 34, was jogging around 4 a.m. on Friday when a man approached her and forced her into an SUV after a brief struggle. Fletcher was reported missing when she did not return home that morning.Also see: Robert Stacy McCain: Memphis Police Charge Suspect With Kidnapping Billionaire Heiress
Late Monday, police tweeted that a body had been found in a Memphis neighborhood but that the identity of that person and the cause of death was unconfirmed. The tweet made no reference to the Fletcher case, saying only that the investigation was ongoing. A large police presence was reported in the area where authorities reported finding the body just after 5 p.m., local news reports said.
It was later reported that the recovered body was indeed that of Mrs Fletcher.
Mr Abston was sentenced to 24 years behind bars, but for some reason yet to be reported in the credentialed media, was released after just 20. We need to know: why was Mr Abston released early? Who took the decision to let him out, and did they have any choice under the law in the Volunteer State? And if there was a choice to keep him locked up, how can we hold the person or people who turned this guy loose early accountable for the consequences of their decision?Abston previously kidnapped a prominent Memphis attorney in 2000, the Commercial Appeal reported. When he was just 16 years old, Abston forced Kemper Durand into the trunk of his own car at gunpoint. After several hours, Abston took Durand out and forced him to drive to a Mapco gas station to withdraw money from an ATM. At the station, an armed Memphis Housing Authority guard walked in and Durand yelled for help. Abston ran away but was found and arrested. He pleaded guilty in 2001 to especially aggravated kidnapping and aggravated robbery, according to court records. He received a 24-year sentence. . . . .
Durand also detailed Abston’s lengthy history in the juvenile court system. In the years before the kidnapping, Abston had been charged with theft, aggravated assault, aggravated assault with a weapon, and rape, according to Durand’s statement.
Remember: Mr Abston was sentenced to 24 years in prison in 2001; had he been serving his full sentence, he would have still been in prison on the day he (allegedly) abducted Mrs Fletcher. If the parole officials in Tennessee had any discretion to keep him locked up, then they bear the responsibility for him being out on the streets and able to kidnap and murder Mrs Fletcher.
One of the major problems in our criminal justice system is that we have the state legislatures, the representatives of the people, passing laws which specify very punitive sentences for criminals, real criminals, and then we have lenient prosecutors offering sweetheart plea bargains, judges who too often sentence convicted criminals to light sentences, and state parole boards who, when they have the option, release hardened criminals back onto the streets before their maximum sentences have been completed. All of this ignores the will of the voters, the people who elect our representatives, and the people who want to see criminals locked up.
It is the fantasy that if the violent are allowed to run free of the White Man’s laws, they wii become peaceful and reasonable. They think that they will be exempt from the inevitable tragedy that follows.
Robert Stacy McCain wrote:
Which leads to the obvious question: did Mr Abston actually earn his sentence reduction through good behavior, or was it simply granted regardless of his in-prison record?
Good behavior in prison requires that a convict has enough intelligence to understand what good behavior is, and the consequences for bad behavior, and, judging from his past record, there is no evidence at all that he understood what bad, what absolutely insane, behavior is.
There was absolutely no upside for kidnapping, probably raping, and murdering Mrs Fletcher. In his twisted mind, he might have ‘enjoyed’ a couple of hours, but that’s it, it was soon over, and the only consequence left was the possibility of being caught and going back to jail.
More, this was apparently not some spontaneous snap, but something actually planned; he had some time to consider the ramifications of his act, and he went ahead and (allegedly) did it anyway.
This, to me, does not sound like someone who would normally have earned “good behavior” time off.