Sometimes you just have to be an [insert slang term for the anus here] to do things right

The oh-so-noble idea behind welfare was the idea that down-on-their-luck people just need a helping hand to get themselves through a rough patch in their lives, to give them a chance to get back on their feet. The problem is that, behind that thinking, is the idea that everyone is actually willing to do the things to straighten out their lives. To the elites who have been putting together our welfare systems, the concept that some people would rather just do their own thing, not caring about getting their lives back in order as long as someone else was paying them to stay indolent was simply outside of their conceptual framework.

Couple that with cultural attitudes of thinking that drug abuse is a victimless crime, and everything falls apart! From The Philadelphia Inquirer:

Addiction takes a toll on life and limb

Amputations are spiking amid Philly’s tranq crisis. It’s a mark of the slow public health response to the latest threat in the drug epidemic

by Aubrey Whelan, Max Marin, and Dylan Purcell | Earth Day, April 22, 2025 | 5:00 AM EDT

The woman came to Samir Mehta’s clinic with a wound in her leg. The infection ran so deep and had destroyed so much soft tissue that Mehta thought he was dealing with an aggressive form of cancer.

As the Penn Medicine orthopedic surgeon was removing infected flesh around the patient’s tibia — a process called debridement – he said the bone began to crumble at his touch, like “rotting wood that falls apart in your hands.”

He decided the only option was to amputate.

It was 2022, and doctors around the Philadelphia region were facing the same decision as hundreds of drug users arrived at hospitals with similarly grave wounds. The harm was unlike anything they’d seen before: blackened hands and fingers, lesions that hollowed out arms and legs to the bone, maggots swimming in rotten flesh.

This new chapter opened in the opioid crisis about five years ago, with Philadelphia becoming ground zero for “tranq,” the street name for xylazine, an animal tranquilizer that quickly overtook the city’s illicit street drugs. Understudied and never approved for human use, tranq doesn’t kill instantly like the powerful synthetic opioid fentanyl.

There’s much more at the original.

I’ve said it before: the huge drug market in Philadelphia exists because the city has so many junkies. The police could arrest dozens, maybe hundreds of dealers, and they’d be replaced by new drug dealers the following day. To clean up Kensington, the internationally famous hellhole of drug abuse, the Mayor, the District Attorney, and the Police Commissioner have to concentrate on arresting the addicts, and putting them in jail at least long enough to get them through withdrawal and detoxification. This is something Larry Krasner, the DA, would never do, because, Heaven forfend! it would leave the poor dears with a criminal record. But not doing so, simply leaving junkies to fend for themselves out on the streets means that they keep shooting up, living on the streets, fouling and terrorizing the SEPTA elevated train station in the neighborhood, committing petty, and some not-so-petty, crimes to feed their drug habits, and now, thanks to tranq, clogging emergency rooms, wasting hospitals’ resources since the junkies can rarely pay their hospital bills and don’t have insurance, and becoming a further drain on society by becoming disabled.

But the toll is clearly devastating: The severity of the skin wounds associated with tranq are costing people their limbs. Amputations among people addicted to opioids have doubled in five years in Philadelphia, The Inquirer found, in an extensive analysis of medical billing data and over six months of interviews with medical professionals, patients, and tranq users.

At least 450 people with documented opioid use disorders had amputations between 2020 and 2023, the analysis found. And that is likely an undercount.

If addicts are arrested and jailed at least long enough to go through detoxification, there is at least a chance that they can be treated and helped to get past their addiction. If they can be detoxed, at least for a while, they will be using whatever [insert vulgar term for feces here] is out on the streets that day.

Naturally, the good, kind, compassionate leftists at the Inquirer put the blame not on the junkies, but the government:

Beyond indicating tranq’s harm, the rise in amputations is also a mark of the slow public health response to the latest threat in the drug epidemic, and shows the limits of available medical treatment.

“(S)low public health response”? How about law enforcement’s response, how about the city’s response to getting these wastrels off the streets? Free Press writer Olivia Reingold wrote “Addiction Activists Say They’re ‘Reducing Harm’ in Philly. Locals Say They’re Causing It” 12½ months ago, noting that, whatever the good and noble intentions of the activists, the residents see it differently:

Those who advocate for harm reduction — a Biden-endorsed policy that prioritizes users’ safety over their sobriety or abstinence — say they’re helping fix the problem. But when I visited Kensington last month, (Sonja Bingham, a 55-year-old mother of three and Kensington resident) and almost a dozen other residents told me that the activists are actually the ones causing it.

The neighborhood is, despite Mayor Cherelle Parker Mullins efforts, still a hellhole, because nobody wants to do the right thing! Arresting and forcibly detoxing the junkies won’t save them all, and there’s a certain point at which I stop caring about those who won’t try to save themselves — I am something of an admitted [insert slang term for the anus here] myself — but the social costs, the welfare costs, the medical costs are all falling not on the junkies but on normal taxpayers.

Shouldn’t a professional writer who ‘wonders’ about something know enough to Google the answer?

While doing research for my previous post, Requiescat in Pace, Pope Francis, I figured that I would check on the very lovely Amanda Marcotte, a loudly self-proclaimed atheist, to see what drivel she had written. As it happens, at least as of 8:00 PM on Easter Monday, our fanatic (neveau) Philadelphian hadn’t written about the Holy Father’s passing, but in a slightly older, April 18th article, I found this commenter on religion having said this:

Do Catholics really fast on Fridays during Lent, I had to wonder.

One thing is certain: she didn’t wonder enough to actually check it out!

Ash Wednesday and Good Friday are obligatory days of fasting and abstinence for Catholics. In addition, Fridays during Lent are obligatory days of abstinence.

For members of the Latin Catholic Church, the norms on fasting are obligatory from age 18 until age 59. When fasting, a person is permitted to eat one full meal, as well as two smaller meals that together are not equal to a full meal. The norms concerning abstinence from meat are binding upon members of the Latin Catholic Church from age 14 onwards.

So, no, we don’t “fast on Fridays during Lent”. We abstain from meat on those Fridays, but the discipline of fasting as well is not imposed, save on Good Friday as well as Ash Wednesday. One would think that a (purportedly) serious writer would have looked it up; Google is both free and our friend.

Miss Marcotte ‘wondered’ about something she didn’t actually know, though her “vague memories growing up in a heavily Catholic part of the country involve people eating a lot of fish at dinner.” Yup, fish is not included in the abstinence requirement, though I will confess that even today I wonder why not. As it happens, I love most fish, and my wife cooks it wonderfully. I do wish that our parish was large enough to support a fish fry on Fridays, as some larger parishes can. But really, how can a (semi) famous (supposedly) professional writer not look up something so simple?

Requiescat in Pace, Pope Francis

My Twitter — I refuse to call it 𝕏 — feed was full of chortling posts claiming that the Vatican denied Vice President J D Vance a meeting with Pope Francis, sending the Vatican’s second-ranking official instead, in what the left loudly proclaimed was a deliberate snub to Mr Vance.

That’s not quite what it was.

The story behind JD Vance’s unlikely visit with Pope Francis

Vance and Francis had publicly disagreed in recent months on immigration policies and other aspects of church teaching.

by Natalie Allison | Monday, April 21, 2025 | 3:19 PM EDT

VATICAN CITY — On JD Vance’s final morning in Rome, the headlines that the pope had snubbed him were already a day old. Donald Trump’s vice president had come on the busiest weekend of the church’s Jubilee year, expecting a meeting with a sickly pope who had already condemned his policies. Of course the head of the church hadn’t granted it, his critics gloated.

Then, on Easter morning, the streets of Rome shut down.

A motorcade whizzed by with a Vatican flag billowing opposite the Stars and Stripes on Vance’s Chevrolet Suburban. The vice president had been called for an audience with Pope Francis.

Vance and Francis have publicly disagreed in recent months on immigration policies and other aspects of church teaching, so an Easter Sunday meeting with the pope was notable. But for Vance, a 40-year-old Catholic convert, to become one of the few individuals to meet Francis on the last full day of his life, when the pope was visibly lacking strength to speak or express emotion, was historic.

Can we tell the truth here? Yes, the Vatican was hugely busy during the Easter weekend, and His Holiness the Pope also knew what no one in any authority in the Vatican wanted to admit publicly: the Pope was dying.

Yes, Pope Francis was very opposed to President Donald Trump’s policies of rounding up and deporting illegal immigrants. But, as USA Today noted:

Barack Obama was moved by Pope Francis’ moral perspective on world problems. Donald Trump said the pontiff made him more determined than ever to pursue peace. And Joe Biden said Francis was happy he was a good Catholic.

Presidents Obama and Biden fully support prenatal infanticide, something which the Catholic Church holds as a very grave mortal sin, and Mr Biden, a Mass-every-Sunday Catholic, went even further than Mr Obama, pushing for taxpayer-funded abortion nationwide in 2025 budget plan and other proposals, along with a federal fund for people who need to take time off work and pay for childcare to obtain an abortion. I’m not exactly certain how that makes Mr Biden a “good Catholic.”

Mr Trump, during his first term when he met with the Holy Father, has always been kind of wishy-washy on abortion, though he did appoint three of the Supreme Court Justices who overturned the repugnant Roe v Wade, but his immigration policies during that term were very much oppose to the Vatican’s view.

Yet the Holy Father met with all of them.

Back to The Washington Post:

“Hello, so good to see you,” Vance said as he approached Francis in his wheelchair. The pope was about to speak a few words to a crowd of tens of thousands in St. Peter’s Square before an archbishop read Francis’s final Easter homily. The message decried “how much contempt is stirred up at times towards the vulnerable, the marginalized and migrants.” The address also warned against elected officials who “yield to the logic of fear, which only leads to isolation from others.”

Vance, in the days leading up to the visit, had vehemently defended the Trump administration’s aggressive deportation agenda, slamming both the “illegal migrant invasion” under President Joe Biden and the “smug, self-assured bullshit” coming from critics of Trump’s deportation policies. The vice president has relished the role of attack dog in an administration that prizes dominance and retribution.

Yet in a plain and starkly lit room in Casa Santa Marta, the pope’s residence[1]Pope Francis chose not to live in the Papal Apartment, preferring a much simpler two-room suite in Casa Santa Marta. within the Vatican, the two men offered only kindness to each other. Vance had sprinted to the pope’s home for a meeting that lasted mere minutes. And he did most of the talking, offering a show of deference not commonly seen since he joined Trump’s ticket and got an office in his White House.

“I know you’ve not been feeling great, but it’s good to see you in better health,” Vance said.

I guess that last was a bit premature!

The position of the Catholic Church on social and political subjects is not something which can be easily categorized as conservative or liberal, right or left wing. The Church is opposed to homosexual marriage, declared homosexual activity to be mortally sinful, homosexual inclinations to be “intrinsically disordered,”[2]From the Catechism of the Catholic Church: §2357 Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the … Continue reading and is opposed to ‘transgenderism’ in any form.

Yet the Church is fully committed to open immigration, and is wholly opposed to war, whether the war in Ukraine, which Mr Biden supported and Mr Trump wants to end, or in Gaza, in which our 46th half-heartedly supported Israel, while our 47th is sending Israel even more powerful weaponry. The Church is opposed to capital punishment.

John F Kennedy, our first Catholic President, had to make clear during his campaign that he would not be ‘taking orders’ from the Vatican. President Biden appeared to be devoutly Catholic, but differed from the Church on many issues. And now, Vice President Vance, a Catholic convert at age 35 who also attends Mass almost every Sunday, has his political differences with the Church, but has apparently no religious differences.

It is a common failing of political liberals and political conservatives alike to try to pigeonhole the late Pontiff specifically, or Catholic Church in general, as liberal or conservative, because our faith is not based on politics. While I would not claim to know the Vice President’s reasons for disagreeing with the Church on immigration, I can tell you mine: the unregulated influx of immigrants, some good people and some very bad, are an attack on Western civilization, the foundation which the Church both built and upon which it depends for its survival. We need a society that is internally peaceful for Christianity, whether Catholic, Protestant, or Orthodox, to survive.

References

References
1 Pope Francis chose not to live in the Papal Apartment, preferring a much simpler two-room suite in Casa Santa Marta.
2 From the Catechism of the Catholic Church:

§2357 Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex. It has taken a great variety of forms through the centuries and in different cultures. Its psychological genesis remains largely unexplained. Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity, tradition has always declared that “homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered.” They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.

§2358 The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies is not negligible. This inclination, which is objectively disordered, constitutes for most of them a trial. They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill God’s will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord’s Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition.

§2359 Homosexual persons are called to chastity. By the virtues of self-mastery that teach them inner freedom, at times by the support of disinterested friendship, by prayer and sacramental grace, they can and should gradually and resolutely approach Christian perfection.

Easter Monday

Our parish church, St Elizabeth of Hungary Catholic Church, is small, with only about 24 families. We can’t afford the fancy decorations that some larger churches can, and don’t really have the room for them, but even in our small church, the Lord is present.

His Holiness Pope Francis passed away this morning, after a bout with pneumonia and a long physical decline. There is no doubt that he loved the Church, even if I disagree with some of his policies as Pope.

Could Daniel Pearson be a conservative? Are there any moderate Democrats left?

Is a member of the Right Eing Extremists of the United States of America allowed to have a favorite liberal writer who I don’t use as a blog whipping boy? I have twice asked if The Philadelphia Inquirer’s primary editorial writer, Daniel Pearson, could actually be a conservative.

He knows that I have asked that question, and certainly denies it, definitely opposed to President Trump and most Republicans, but he is at least in some ways the kind of Democrat conservatives can appreciate. He’s certainly not a loony leftist like his colleagues Will Bunch and the rest of the newspaper’s cabal of columnists! While he seems to support some silliness like the city’s silly driving while black driving equality law, he does support the enforcement of law.

Fake, expired, and obscured car tags threaten public safety | Editorial

Continue reading

You in a heap o’ trouble, boy! Bad causes attract crazy people

Robert Stacy McCain warned us about jumping to conclusions before all of the facts were in about Cody Balmer, the man charged with setting fire to the Pennsylvania Governor’s Mansion.

As soon as Pennsylvania State Police announced that Cody Balmer had been charged with setting the fire at the Pennsylvania governor’s mansion in Harrisburg, someone found Balmer’s Facebook page and a deep dive found little evidence to point to a motive. Like most other people — including Gov. Josh Shapiro himself — I immediately assumed the motive must be antisemitism. Like, you attack the residence of the Jewish governor on the first night of Passover, what else could it be?

So when I plunged into Balmer’s Facebook page, I expected to find evidence that the suspect was either (a) a neo-Nazi Jew-hater or (b) a “progressive” pro-Palestinian Jew-hater. But there was no evidence of either inclination. In fact, there was very little hint of political inclinations at all. The guy was a welder and mechanic, with a black wife and four mixed-race kids, which obviously seemed to rule out any neo-Nazi tendencies, but there weren’t any “free Palestine” messages, either, He had a couple of sarcastic posts indicating he wasn’t a big fan of Joe Biden, but there weren’t any MAGA pro-Trump messages, either. Thomas Stevenson of The Post Millennial dug even deeper than I did and discovered that Balmer described himself as a “registered socialist,” so it’s a fair surmise he was a Bernie Bro back in the day, which might explain his disdain of Biden as an “establishment” Democrat. Continue reading

Harvard University defends anti-Semitism and racial discrimination

Hahvahd University is a private school, over which President Donald Trump, the hopefully soon-to-be-closed Department of Education, and the federal government in general have no direct authority. With an endowment of $50.7 billion as of the end of its 2023 fiscal year. Founded October 28, 1636, Harvard is the oldest institution of higher learning in the United States, as well as the wealthiest.

From The Wall Street Journal:

Harvard Says It Will Fight Trump Administration Demands

Continue reading

Thank you, Jill Biden! We owe Dr Biden a debt of gratitude which can never be fully repaid: she helped save this country from having the kook from California in the White House!

Golly gee willikers gee whiz! Vice President Kamala Harris couldn’t have lost to Orange Man Bad, so someone must have sabotaged her!

Our good friends on the left were stunned, shocked, aghast, appalled that Kamala Harris Emhoff lost the 2024 election to then former President Donald Trump, and they keep looking for reasons why it happened. But the one thing that they just can’t bring themselves to consider is the notion that she was simply a rotten candidate. Continue reading

Throwing good money after bad

It was thanks to Robert Stacy McCain that I saw this tweet from the Defender of the Republic.

Britney Spears has a guesstimated net worth of $60 million, according to Forbes, or perhaps a paltry $40 million, estimated by Celebrity Net Worth. The Defender wondered why no one could help a clearly wealthy and attractive woman. I know virtually nothing about Miss Spears, but I wouldn’t be surprised if the answer is that no one has helped her because she doesn’t want to be helped.

Which brings me to the more serious:

Only two people have successfully completed the Kensington ‘wellness court’ so far. The Parker administration wants to expand it.

Nearly two-thirds of the more than 40 people brought before the court since late January have dropped out of treatment within days, and then failed to appear at follow-up hearings.

Continue reading